lunes, 21 de mayo de 2012

Abolishing Holyrood should be an option, por AD





Artículo publicado en The Scotsman el 14 de mayo de 2012

BALLOT papers for the independence referendum should include an option for those who want to abolish the Scottish Parliament to “express their opinion”, according to veteran politician Tam Dalyell.

The retired MP – famous for first posing the “West Lothian Question” on whether, post-devolution, Scottish MPs should be able to vote on issues that only pertain to England – said the “devo-max” option on the ballot would destabilise the British tax system and pointed the way to the break-up of the UK.

Mr Dalyell, known in his 43-year parliamentary career as a leader of the “awkward squad”, continued his long guerilla war against devolution as he spoke at the Boswell Book Festival in Ayrshire at the weekend.

“It’s unlikely to happen, but I think there should be a way in which those who want the parliament brought to an end can express their opinion,” he said.

“I think that there are very few politicians who would want it, there are very few journalists who would want it, but I think there are a great many people up and down Scotland [who would]. I’m not saying it’s a majority.”

Mr Dalyell, who retired from parliament in 2005, declined to give his predictions on the future of the independence debate, saying he was not a “soothsayer”.

However, he predicted that opposition to independence, and the Scottish Parliament itself, could harden.

In 1977, in a House of Commons debate on devolution, Mr Dalyell – MP for West Lothian – first asked how long English MPs and their constituencies would tolerate MPs from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland voting on purely English matters at Westminster. Fellow MP Enoch Powell later called it the “West Lothian Question” after Mr Dalyell refused to let the issue drop.

The Boswell Book Festival is devoted to autobiography, memoir, and other forms of “life-writing”. It is named after James Boswell, considered the father of modern biography, and held at his family’s ancestral home, Auchinleck House.

Speakers ranged from the actor Timothy West to Holocaust survivor Zdenka Fantlova, and included leading Scottish writers such as novelist Janice Galloway and the playwright and painter John Byrne. Mr Dalyell’s own autobiography, The Importance of Being Awkward, was published last year.

He has long supported strong local government, but not devolution, arguing that politicians would fight for more powers for a Scottish Parliament, as they do with any institution they belong to. He cites the example of Barbara Castle, who campaigned against Britain joining the EU but became an ardent supporter of more powers for the European Parliament after heading the Labour delegation there.

He said: “I do know I have a minority opinion, and that is that if there is a Scottish Parliament to continue then it will be very difficult to avoid something that is indistinguishable from an independent state.

“The present situation is not stable, and what I am entitled to say is, ‘Yes, I don’t know what will happen, but what I would like to happen is the abolition of the Edinburgh parliament’.”

He added: “There is no way in which devo-max, if it’s the break-up of fiscal and monetary powers, can form a stable situation. People will have to make up their minds – do they want to be separate from England or not? In my belief there is a majority of Scottish people who do not want to see separation.”




jueves, 10 de mayo de 2012


En la última estadística publicada en SCOTUSBlog, imprescindible bitácora para el gran público interesado en conocer la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos, cuyo enlace ofrecemos a nuestros lectores, se ofrecen en apenas seis páginas de un nivel de detalle ejemplar, los datos referentes al último año judicial, incluso contrastándolo con los años precedentes. Algunas de las conclusiones a las que se puede llegar son las siguientes:

I.- Consolidación del número de asuntos cuyo conocimiento acepta el Tribunal Supremo. En los años ochenta el número llegaba a los casi ciento treinta, sin embargo, a comienzos de los noventa apenas sobrepasaba los cien (años 90-92), para descender a los poco más de ochenta (años 93-94 y 96), con un inusual repunte en el año 1997. Desde 1998 el Tribunal Supremo se mueve en torno a los 75 casos resueltos por año.
II.- Elevado índice de sentencias estimatorias rectificando los órganos inferiores. En el 70% de los casos el Tribunal ha rectificado el criterio del órgano judicial inferior.
III.- Peculiar batalla jurídica con el Tribunal de Apelaciones del Noveno Circuito. En efecto, casi un tercio de los asuntos proviene de asuntos que tienen su origen en dicho órgano judicial. El porcentaje de sentencias estimatorias de recursos procedentes de dicho origen es ligeramente superior al de la media general (73%).
IV.- Mayorías. Sólo una quinta parte de los casos se resuelve por una mayoría de 5-4; prácticamente el mismo porcentaje de casos se ha resuelto por sentencias que gozaron del apoyo unánime de los magistrados, mientras que un 12% de los asuntos se resolvió por una amplia mayoría de 8-1. Los asuntos resueltos por amplia mayoría suponen en principio una decisión clara que raramente será objeto de revisión, cuando menos a corto plazo, mientras que la doctrina vertida en decisiones tomadas por una mayoría ajustada (5-4) pueden ser objeto de rectificación simplemente con que uno de los magistrados que formen parte de la mayoría abandone el Tribunal.
V.- Decisivo papel del Justice Anthony Kennedy. En el 88% de los casos en que las decisiones se toman por una mayoría de 5-4, Anthony Kennedy forma parte de la misma, es decir, que se encuentra en la privilegiada situación de tener en su mano la llave para la resolución de un asunto. No obstante, en el 63% de las ocasiones, Kennedy se orienta hacia el ala conservadora del Tribunal (no en vano Anthony Kennedy es el segundo magistrado más veterano, al haber sido designado por Reagan en 1987; únicamente Antonin Scalía le aventaja por unos meses, dado que fue elegido magistrado a finales de 1986). Kennedy hereda, así, el papel que hasta su renuncia desempeñaba Sandra Day O´Connor, quien a su vez había heredado la posición de Lewis Powel